Skip navigation
News  >  News Article  

Saving lives, preserving infrastructure

Lehigh’s structural engineers took another step toward their goal of “sustainable infrastructure” recently when they helped conduct a successful experiment on the world’s largest earthquake shake table.

The test verified the superior performance of a reinforced concrete building system that contained earthquake-resisting technology developed at Lehigh’s ATLSS (Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems) Center.

The ATLSS technology, a self-centering system, enables a building to survive an earthquake with no loss of life and little or no damage. It consists of reinforced concrete wall panels that are designed to “rock” during an earthquake with post-tensioned steel strands that, like a rubber band, pull the building back back to its original position.

The test was conducted at the Hyogo Earthquake Engineering Research Center, or E-Defense Center, in Japan. Lehigh researchers joined peers from the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) in the U.S. and the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) in Japan.

The collaboration was led by E-Defense researchers, and the experiment was funded by the Japanese government.

A contest between new and conventional

E-Defense researchers built two full-scale models of a reinforced-concrete four-story building—one including the ATLSS system and one built with conventional reinforced concrete.

The E-Defense shake table simulated the 1995 Kobe Earthquake in Japan using recorded data from the actual event. The table also simulated the maximum-intensity earthquake expected in coastal California.

“The self-centering post-tensioned concrete wall system performed extremely well with very little damage under very strong earthquake ground motions,” ATLSS director Richard Sause and Wesley Keller, a Ph.D. candidate, reported.

“Many researchers were surprised by how well the self-centering wall system performed,” said Sause. “There was little to no damage. We think that’s the type of performance that should be expected. By contrast, the conventional reinforced concrete in the adjacent building was badly damaged.”

Preserving a community’s value

ATLSS researchers have studied post-tensioned self-centering structural systems for almost two decades in an effort to develop sustainable infrastructure that can survive earthquakes with little or no damage.

The goal, says Sause, is not only to protect lives but to ensure that building and transportation facilities remain operational after a major earthquake, thereby preserving the social and economic value of the affected community.

“Think of San Francisco,” says Sause. “What will happen when the next big earthquake hits? Twenty years ago, the question was, ‘Can we build structures that protect the lives of people?’

“Today, the question is, ‘Where are people going to live if there’s extensive damage to the city’s infrastructure?’ What will happen if, say, one-third or more of the people and businesses have to leave?”

The E-Defense Center test followed two years of planning and was part of a multi-year collaboration between NEES and NIED. Researchers from the University of California-Berkeley, UCLA, the University of Texas, Tokyo University, and Kyoto University also took part in the project.

Lehigh is one of 15 member institutions in NEES, which is funded by the National Science Foundation. The Lehigh NEES facility is directed by James Ricles, professor of structural engineering.

The director of E-Defense, Masayoshi Nakashima, received his Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1981. On March 25 in Sinclair Auditorium, he will give an address titled “Safeguarding Quality of Life: the Role of Large-Scale Testing.” The event, part of the Fazlur R. Khan Distinguished Lecture Series, is sponsored by the department of civil and environmental engineering and the department of art and architecture.

Photos courtesy of Wesley Keller
 
Posted on Thursday, February 17, 2011
 
 
The 15-by-20-meter E-Defense shake table simulated the effects of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake on two four-story buildings. Two hundred people observed the test, which was funded by Japan’s government.
 
“The self-centering wall system sustained little to no damage. We think that’s the type of performance that should be expected.”—Richard Sause
 
Wesley Keller, E-Defense project manager Takuya Nagae and Richard Sause in front of the shake table at the Hyogo Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
The enduring value of elasticity

Self-centering post-tensioned concrete walls are made by casting panels of reinforced concrete and then feeding steel cables through pre-existing hollow ducts in the panels.

“When the panels are in place,” says Sause, “ the cables are tensioned, or stretched, and then anchored at the top and bottom of the wall, which clamps the panels together.”

Prestressing technology has been around for over a century, but many engineers questioned its ability to resist earthquake loading. Then, in the mid-1990s, Lehigh researchers led by Sause and Stephen Pessiki, professor of structural engineering, found that by using “unbonded” post-tensioned steel, concrete walls could be designed to perform very well even under very strong ground shaking.

The key, says Sause, is that the post-tensioned steel is not bonded to the surrounding concrete. This distributes deformations in the steel over a relatively long length rather than concentrating them in a small critical region. As a result, strain levels in the post-tensioned steel are significantly decreased during earthquake loading.

The post-tensioned concrete wall system also exhibits “gap opening” behavior at the joints between the wall panels that allows the lateral force resistance of the wall to “soften” as earthquake-induced forces in the structure increase. This softening behavior reduces the transmissibility between the ground shaking and the building, which decreases the earthquake-induced forces in the building. 

“Conventional reinforced concrete walls also soften during earthquake loading but not in the same way,” says Sause. “In this case, the softening is from permanent damage in the form of concrete cracking and yielding of the steel reinforcing, which permanently distorts the structure, causing the building to lean after the earthquake. This can be very difficult and expensive to repair.

“By contrast, an unbonded post-tensioned structure remains nearly elastic during earthquake shaking with little permanent structural damage. As a result, it returns to its original shape after the earthquake without the need for costly repairs.”

 

CONNECT
Twitter Facebook RSS YouTube iTunes U
 
 

Lehigh University • 27 Memorial Drive West, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA • (610) 758-3000
 

Loading